by Margo Kingston
February 5th, 2013
An ABC deep throat has provided AFHP with the following statement:
In December 2011 the ABC was found by the ACMA to have breached the impartiality codes of the ABC Code of Practice.
The broadcast session involved was an interview with former SA Deputy Premier, Kevin Foley (Labor), on the breakfast timeslot of ABC Local Radio Adelaide.
The ACMA found:
…that the presenters displayed ﬁxed prejudgment on the topics discussed, asked loaded questions and used disparaging language.
The ABC released a statement saying:
“The ABC acknowledges the ACMA’s ruling following a lengthy and highlycomplex investigation
“The ABC has vigorously defended the broadcast throughout the ACMA’s deliberations and is surprised at the outcome.
“Our interpretation of the ABC’s Code of Practice in this instance differs from that of ACMA, and we continue to disagree
“Matthew Abraham and David Bevan are experienced broadcasters, with a reputation for asking tough questions in a robust political environment.
“This approach will continue in line with the ABC’s editorial policies.”
Seems a double-standard from the ABC.
I note that in 2011 the ABC released a statement and reported the ACMA ﬁnding
(Watchdog rules Foley interview not impartial’)
This year, the ABC issued no statement, did not report the matter and, as revealed by Peter Clarke in ‘Who is wearing the Kafka mask at the ABC?’ has refused to release its reasons for reprimanding Faine and apologising to complainants. I have referred this material to Peter Clarke for analysis.
Footnote: Mark Scott has yet to reply to my letter about Jon Faine .
Further references for 2011 case
Matthew Abraham and David Bevan Interview