21 reasons candidates ignore media requests, by Forde reporter @StephanieDale22

Stephanie Dale

Stephanie Dale

Citizen Journalist at No Fibs
Stephanie Dale is a journalist and author with a background of 25 years in media, politics and publishing. Stephanie believes we need to find new ways of sharing our Earth, and making way for all its people, not just those privileged by the current economic system, and all its creatures - on their own terms.
Stephanie Dale
- 2 months ago
Stephanie Dale
I have two published books available - the novel Hymn for the Wounded Man and the travel memoir My Pilgrim's Heart, which was reviewed recently by the Huffington Post.

 

Forde

By Stephanie Dale @stephaniedale22

20 August 2013

More than a week ago, No Fibs sent a list of standardised questions to the seven candidates vying for the seat of Forde, sandwiched between Brisbane and the Gold Coast.

Four responded – all three women and Peter Beattie.

Was that a coincidence?

As the reporter who compiled and distributed those questions, and posted the answers, as I stared at the No Fibs Q & A post I became somewhat enthralled by the common thread.

Prior to posting, I was puzzled by why the three absentees would not respond to free, standardised, level playing field, no risk of media interpretation, in their own words coverage.

A turn of the dial and the more interesting question emerged.

Peter BeattieAmanda BestJan PukallusSally Spain

 

 

 

 

 

Apparently it’s a scientific fact that women are wired for communication, and after nine years as Queensland Premier Peter Beattie’s renown as a communicator is well known to the Forde electorate – as well as pundits state- and nationwide.

One could posit the idea that the women – The Greens’ Sally Spain, Family First’s Amanda Best and Citizens Electoral Council’s Jan Pukallus – and Peter Beattie are more worthy of their constituency’s vote by virtue of their willingness to communicate – for what other trait could be of higher value in a democratic parliament?

And one could explore the converse: why would the sitting member, the Liberal Party’s Bert van Manen, and two ostensibly keen candidates, Palmer United’s Blair Brewster and Rise Up Australia’s Jonathan Jennings, ignore an opportunity to speak directly to voters?

Bert van ManenBlair Brewster Jonathan Jennings

 

 

 

 

 

Here are 21 reasons why a candidate might ignore a media request (it was going to be 99 reasons, but I realised I had other things to do) – let’s start with the obvious:

  1. they didn’t receive the questions

* in Bert van Manen’s case that means his media adviser didn’t get No Fibs’ phone calls either
* in Blair Brewster’s case that meant the Coomera Hockey Club didn’t pass on the message – Mr Brewster’s campaign contact is his CHC email . . . or perhaps he’s just showcasing his community credentials with that email address, being a founder of the club ‘n’all
* in Jonathan Jennings’ case . . . drowning out media noise with Rise Up Australia’s party song?

2. they’re really really busy (really busy)

3. they’re not that serious about their candidacy

4. they’re exceedingly cautious

5. they think it was a set up

6. they don’t wanna waste their time on ‘nobody reporters’ (that would be moi)

7. they don’t trust a website called No Fibs

8. they don’t trust the media generally

9. they don’t trust new media specifically

10. they didn’t believe their questions would run verbatim

11. they’re above common courtesy (so many Christian values, so few ‘thanks but no thanks’)

12. they baulked at venturing off-script into dangerously reflective minefields, such as question # 7: ‘in order to achieve your vision, what hard realities must the people of Forde face?’

13. they fear the realm of thoughtful response – yes there is life beyond the simple slogan horizon

14. they actually don’t know their stuff

15. they’re only in it to fly the flag for bigger fish (Palmer United)

16. they are inexperienced

17. they are spooked (van Manen post Beattie surprise?)

18. they’re still reeling from national exposure (post Beattie surprise)

19. they’re playing a small target game

20. they thought the questions were very very tricky, particularly ‘why are you the person to deliver?’

21. unlike Beattie, Best, Pukallus and Spain – they just don’t wanna talk about it.

More Forde Stories


Support an independent media voice. Support No Fibs Citizen Journalism.
Monthly Donation



Comments

  1. joy cooper says

    Hehe, probably all 21. Do confess I risked a listen to the Rise Up party song. Well that is 50 seconds I won’t get back.

    You would think van Manen would jump at the chance to have his voice heard but the LNP does tend to not really understand the Fifth Estate or how the web really works. As for the PUP they don’t appear to be taking this seriously as if they think Clive’s chutzpah is all they need to “win”. The Rise Up party is another of those fringe groups which aren’t all that open about their real agenda so they wouldn’t want to answer your questions, Stephanie.


  2. This kind of filtering works. Thanks…


  3. Perhaps with a reported 60/40 advantage van Manen figures he doesn’t need to talk to anyone he doesn’t choose to. This seat polisher would do well to remember who he works for, and it isn’t Tony Abbott.