Equal Love and gay marriage law reform: Wills candidates talk to @takvera

John Englart

John Englart

Citizen journalist at No Fibs
John Englart has always had a strong social and environmental focus and over the past 10 years climate change science, climate policy and climate protest have become an increasingly important and primary focus of his work as a citizen journalist.
John Englart
- 9 hours ago
John Englart
I am involved in various Moreland-based community groups including Sustainable Fawkner where I blog on local and sustainability issues, Climate Action Moreland and Moreland Bicycle Users Group. I am also a member of Friends of the Earth, off and on, since 1976, and wrote the contribution on the Rides Against Uranium in the 1970s for the Friends of the Earth Australia book to mark the 30-year anniversary of FoE – 30 Years of Creative Resistance.

By John Englart

18 August 2013

Gay marriage law reform, equal love, is about ending a disrciminatory practice presently enshrined in law. It would be something so easy to do and to move on to much bigger issues. Yet it lingers as an issue at another Federal election.

This week Prime Minister Kevin Rudd promised that if re-elected, he would introduce a bill on the issue within 100 days and allow Labor party members a conscience vote.

IMG_5766-rainbow-labor

Tony Abbott this week labelled gay marriage as “the fashion of the moment” in a radio interview. He has refused so far to similarly allow a conscience vote on the issue by the Liberal Party.

Australian Marriage Equality national director, Rodney Croome, said in a media release “Marriage equality is about love, commitment, family and fairness, all of which are fundamentally important to the majority of Australians.”

According to Australian Marriage Equality website www.vote4love.com.au, the Greens, Australian Sex Party and Socialist Alliance, among many others, all support marriage equality. The Australian Labor Party and Palmer United Party currently allow a conscience vote on the issue. The Liberal Party are currently opposed to marriage law reform but are committed to considering a conscience vote after the election. Family First oppose marriage equality. Other parties not running in Wills are also assessed.

Many overseas countries have already ended marriage discrimination. The New Zealand parliament voted and passed same sex marriage law reform this year, with the public gallery bursting into a Maori love song which many members of parliament also joined in singing. (Watch youtube video)

Should ending a discriminatory practice ever be a conscience vote? Our politicians should be leading on this issue, not dithering. I asked Wills candidates in my one-on-one interviews about Gay Marriage law reform. Here is what they had to say:

Kelvin Thomson (ALP): We passed legislation to get rid of provisions which discriminated against gay people in a whole range of areas including finance, superannuation, property and the like. In relation to same sex marriage, there was a bill that came before the parliament that I voted against. The background to that was not that I have a personal objections to gay marriage but the member for Melbourne moved a motion in the parliament asking us to survey our electorates to gauge their opinions, and I voted in favour of that resolution, I therefore carried out a survey. The resolution was passed, and I thought I was in favour of it so I better carry out the survey and I did. A majority of people in the electorate who replied to me, replied opposing it. Some people are surprised by that but that is what happened and having carried out that survey John, I thought you’d look a bit of a fool if you carried out a survey and said no I’m not interested in what you said and I’m going to go and vote in a different direction. I would like to see the Liberal Party give its people a conscience vote on it. I think at the moment, the Labor party is the only party voting in a conscience vote on this issue I think it would be a better parliamentary process if Tony Abbott were to give all his members a conscience vote. There is no prospect of legislative change unless their is a conscience vote on the other side.

Tim Read (Greens): I would have liked to have thought that Australia could lead the way here but it is too late now. I think there are a good dozen or so countries now, many of them European. Many states in the US, not the US nationally. So its now a case of marriage equality being widely considered, a sort of normal human right in a civilised country. The time for pontificating, and I use that word deliberately, about the issue is over. This is something we have just got to do so we stop looking silly. I think that people upset about gay marriage should be reassured that they don’t have to marry a gay person. There can be no reason to object to gay marriage other than churlishness.

Adrian Trajstman (Australian Sex Party): It’s something that is so easy to do. You’ve got Kelvin Thomson opposing the marriage amendment. It was fantastic last night Rudd coming out and saying 100 days if we get in. This is at the forefront of our agenda.

I pointed out to Adrian that Thomson voted according to the results of the survey he conducted. He replied, “That really incenses me. … It is at the forefront of our agenda and it is something that needs to happen, and the ball has started rolling. It’s ridiculously important. If I was in that position I would never have opposed that bill. Never.”

Adrian Trajstman (holding the B) with other members of the Sex Party at Equal Love Rally

Adrian Trajstman (holding the B) with other members of the Sex Party at Equal Love Rally

Dean O’Callaghan (Independent standing on Save the Planet policies): Everyone should be able to do whatever they want as long as it doesn’t hurt anyone else.

Maragarita Windisch (Socialist Alliance): I absolutely support marriage equality. This is one of the most fundamental human rights and civil liberties issues that no matter what your gender, no matter what your sexuality you should be able to marry the person you love. I don’t accept that the Labor Party want to have a conscience vote on that. There seems to be no problem making decisions when it comes to cuts very quickly and there is no conscience vote when we go to war. Something when you think about it that should really be so insignificant really. What is the impact of letting people marry for love? There is no big economic cost to that. It seems the Labor Party like the Liberal party are pandering to a very vocal but very small minority in Australia to actually deny people a basic human right. The majority of Australians support marriage equality and it’s time we actually get that.

Watch Margarita Windisch speaking at the Equal Love Rally on Youtube

Note:
Since Friday and the Declaration of Nominations in Wills I have also become aware that Concetta GIGLIA is standing for Family First, and Anne Maree MURRAY-DUFOULON is standing for the Palmer United Party. Over the last two weeks I have also attempted to contact the Liberal Party candidate, Shilpa Hegde, to organise a one-on-one candid interview, including her views on same sex marriage, but I have so far received no follow up to my repeated requests. I have been unable to arrange interviews with these three candidates to ascertain their personal views on marriage equality law reform.

See previous Wills election reports


Support an independent media voice. Support No Fibs Citizen Journalism.
Monthly Donation



Comments


  1. The “fashion of the moment” is “Slick’ Abbott with the Murdoch media.

    Wonder where the “fashion of the moment” with all the child abuse inquiries Cardinal Pell is lately.

    Anyone heard from “the fashion of the moment” James Ashby lately ?

    “Slick’ Abbott “compatriots” appear to be missing in action.

    Good luck to all the candidates with the exception of the Liberal candidate who also appears to be missing in action.


  2. Great to see this issue on the lips of as many candidates as possible. Good work!

  3. Relle Graefe says

    The survey Kelvin says he carried out was tucked away in one of his Wills Report leaflets that is letterboxed –

    http://www.kelvinthomson.com.au/editor/assets/wills_report/110221%20wills%20summer%202011%20electorate%20report%20final.pdf

    – with nothing on the front cover alluding to the fact there was a survey within it. I wonder how many people binned this without even realising the survey was in it?

    I only knew about it because I contacted his office asking about the survey and they told me where to find it.


  4. I completed Kelvin Thomson’s constituent survey on same sex marriage and I indicated that I was in favour of the same. From memory the total number of survey respondents was several hundred….a very small % of Wills’ 90,000 enrolled voters. My hunch is that often in these kind of surveys it is often people who are opposed to something who are motivated to vote on a particular question….it is a bit similar to people complain when something does not go their way but take many things for granted when things go along ok….part of human nature. While I think a local MP should work closely with his/her constituents, I don’t believe he/she needs to necessarily be bound to a particular survey outcome – unless he/she indicates that is what will happen. Part of being a community leader and showing leadership can sometimes mean what a section of your community do not agree…..that is how life goes. On the issue of marriage equality, I think most of our existing politicians have failed to show leadership. The ALP now has a policy saying they support marriage equality. However, instead of requiring all their MPs to support such a policy, they take the “easy” road, and allow a conscience vote – meaning an ALP MP can vote no and against his/her own party’s agreed policy. I think this is a failure of real leadership by the ALP. I have to admit I am a bit cynical about Kevin Rudd’s sudden “conversion” to supporting same sex marriage having opposed it in the past. Is it a genuine change of mind or is it just a pre-election strategy to win a few votes….on a par with his appalling asylum seeker policy to punish people for seeking safety in Australia?