Margo Kingston

Margo Kingston

Co-publisher and editor-in-chief at No Fibs
Margo Kingston is a retired Australian journalist and climate change activist. She is best known for her stint as Phillip Adamsā€™ ā€˜Canberra Babylonā€™ contributor and her work at The Sydney Morning Herald and #Webdiary. Since 2012, Kingston has been a citizen journalist, reporting and commenting on Australian politics via Twitter and No Fibs.
Margo Kingston

098449-mark-scott

February 4, 2013

Mr Mark Scott,
Managing Director
ABC

Dear Mark,


Re: ABC apology to anonymous complainant and reprimand to Jon Faine over hisĀ interview with former shock-jock Michael SmithĀ 

I write to seek information on this matter and express my concerns at its process.

I first learned of it through a strongly worded protest by ABC political editor ChrisĀ Uhlmann published on Twitter at @CUhlmann:

The ABCā€™s finding that Jon Faine is guilty of a ā€œlapse in standardsā€ in 2 interviewsĀ on the AWU slush fund is absurd. http://t.co/6pOOlvtd

Jon challenged two journalists to defend claims that the Prime Minister acted improperly in her former career as a lawyer.

Jon believes that, based on the publicly available evidence, the Prime Minister did no wrong. To date, the facts support that view.

The interviews, which so shamed the ABCā€™s correctness commissars, were robust exchanges between a broadcaster and two journalists.

Jon pressed them to lay out the key allegations and provide evidence to supportĀ their claims of wrongdoing. In short, he did his job. Well.

Jon is one of the jewels of local radioā€™s crown and I am proud that I was once hisĀ producer. I await a robust defence of him from management.

While on the topic. I also think itā€™s high time we fell in behind our peerless politicalĀ commentator Barrie Cassidy.

Naturally I was interested to find out more.

Chrisā€™s link was to an OZ paywall story. I found a short piece at Fairfax.Ā I found nothing at all on the ABC mediaĀ platforms or on its corporate website.

Luckily, former ABC broadcaster Peter ClarkeĀ sent me the result of his in-depth search, a very buried, very brief statement of theĀ decision with no background or reasons.

4hcwanT

To my great surprise I got more information from Mr Smithā€™s website, because heĀ published the ABC email to the anonymous complainant, who appears to be one of Ā his fans.Ā See ā€˜Jon Faine – will you resign?ā€™

As I write, I can find no media release by the ABC and no news story on the apology,Ā reprimand or Mr Uhlmannā€™s call for ABC management to back Mr Faine and withdraw theĀ finding.

The day after the finding, a listener who had heard Jon Faine comment on air, reported

Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  FAINE NEWS: @MsMountebank reports that during ā€˜Wrapā€™ segment today JonĀ Faine said he Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  Ā  wasnā€™t happy with the ABC decision against him and had asked for aĀ review.

However, he said he had conflicting advice whether it was possible to get a review.

Faine also noted that within minutes of receiving the decision it was online at TheĀ Age, which did not ask him for comment. This was despite the fact that one of theĀ people in the interview complained of was Age journalist Mark Baker.

Editors note: The Age needs to be asked if Faineā€™s allegation is true, and if so, toĀ explain its poor form. I would also love to publish an interview with Mr. FaineĀ in http://australiansforhonestpolitics.wordpress.comĀ Any takers?

Mr Faineā€™s comments were not reported by the ABC and ABC Melbourne radio did notĀ reply to my request for audio of his remarks. The Australian reported them behind aĀ paywallĀ and Crikey also reportedĀ behind a pay wall. Michael Smith reported them here. Fairfax, despite the criticismĀ by Mr Faine of its actions, was silent. I tried in vain to obtain from Melbourne ABC radio anĀ audio or transcript of Mr Faineā€™s remarks.

To be blunt, I was horrified by the process, the failure ofĀ transparency by corporate ABC, the apparent censorship by ABC news platforms, and the lack of respect shown to Mr Faineā€™s listeners. I also believe it is wrong not to publish the background to and reasoning behind such an importantĀ decision. It is unfair to Mr Faine, contemptuous of his listeners, and inimical toĀ transparency in what will be an extraordinarily fraught election year.

I tweeted the following into the ABC void:

Mark, I find myself in agreement with Gerard Henderson at The Sydney Institute website:

As ABC managing director and editor-in-chief, Mark Scott is paid substantially moreĀ than the Treasurer Wayne Swan.Ā  When there is a complaint about a senior ABCĀ figure like Jon Faine, this clearly is a matter for the public broadcasterā€™s editor-inchief to resolve.Ā  However, nice Mr Scott delegates such key matters to middle levelĀ ABC bureaucrats based in Canberra.

Please explain.

Sincerely,

Margo Kingston

@margokingston1

https://australiansforhonestpolitics.wordpress.com/

Audio of the 2 Jon Faine interviews in question:Ā Jon Faine Interview with Mike Smith and Mark Baker 23 November 2013

AFHP Archive for Jon Faine apologyĀ 

Selected tweets from working journalists concerned at the implications of the FaineĀ decision:

https://twitter.com/Gay_Alcorn/status/297229213394685954

https://twitter.com/snooplady/status/296790501061967873

 

 

Play

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Subscribe: RSS